Kirsch likes to debate only when he thinks he can win. So, sadly, he won't debate fluvoxamine. He paid a scientist to produce a study that said what he wanted: that fluvoxamine reduces inflammation in the brain, and is a potential treatment. Scientists are known to do those things. Not unlike musical composers used to dedicate their work…
Kirsch likes to debate only when he thinks he can win. So, sadly, he won't debate fluvoxamine. He paid a scientist to produce a study that said what he wanted: that fluvoxamine reduces inflammation in the brain, and is a potential treatment. Scientists are known to do those things. Not unlike musical composers used to dedicate their works to their wealthy patrons, because the patron would benefit from the prestige of the composer. Virtue by association is as fallacious as guilt by association.
Kirsch likes to debate only when he thinks he can win. So, sadly, he won't debate fluvoxamine. He paid a scientist to produce a study that said what he wanted: that fluvoxamine reduces inflammation in the brain, and is a potential treatment. Scientists are known to do those things. Not unlike musical composers used to dedicate their works to their wealthy patrons, because the patron would benefit from the prestige of the composer. Virtue by association is as fallacious as guilt by association.