11 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

would be interesting to see a debate between the Steve Kirsch types who love fluvoxamine and those like yourself

Expand full comment

Yes because Kirsch is in the Fluvoxamine camp…SSRI’s are no bueno for nada!

Expand full comment

I know. I am completely surprised that he thinks they are good for a virus.

What happened to his brain?

Expand full comment

As time goes by I find Kirsch’s ‘messaging’ to be suspect. I barely read his substacks anymore.

Expand full comment

Yep. I unsubscribed from his Substack and unfollowed him on Twitter. I still occasionally see his Tweets that others I follow share, but I take them with a grain of salt...

Expand full comment

Psychiatric drugs do cause brain damage.

Expand full comment

They do…irrevocably changes the brains chemistry!

Expand full comment

This well deserved demonization of SSRI's may be happening now because they want to force genetic "therapies" for depression, so they need to exterminate competing drugs to fabricate the need for that nonsense. Vampire gonna vampire.

Expand full comment

Like to see his pineal gland after being on some of those SSRI's. They've got flouride in them and flouride calcifies the pineal gland. Not a good thing. Oh... flouride also takes up iodine receptors in the body. Good luck, Steve.

Expand full comment

Steve Kirsch is a corporate trained operative. Many believe he's a moron. What's a trainable imbecile? Answer: Steve Kirsch...

Expand full comment

Kirsch likes to debate only when he thinks he can win. So, sadly, he won't debate fluvoxamine. He paid a scientist to produce a study that said what he wanted: that fluvoxamine reduces inflammation in the brain, and is a potential treatment. Scientists are known to do those things. Not unlike musical composers used to dedicate their works to their wealthy patrons, because the patron would benefit from the prestige of the composer. Virtue by association is as fallacious as guilt by association.

Expand full comment